'Pedophilia' is Not Wrong

UFOs, lost socks, discuss whatever you like here.

Moderators: Master_Kale, TNM Team

Post Reply
Eternalist
Mole Person
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:38 pm
Location: The Land of Eternity
Contact:

'Pedophilia' is Not Wrong

Post by Eternalist »

The whole, "every time someone watches CP, the victim is re-victimized" garbage is laughably ridiculous. If this is true, then that means every time someone watches a video of a car crash, a murder, being bitten by a shark, etc., the victim is re-victimized. The logic is sorely lacking here, but that's par for the course when it comes to feminist nonsense. Unfortunately, even though this is a ridiculous notion, the mind can make it real. I'm gonna need to see some research showing that random people finding CP that had already been made has any effect on the rates of distribution or I call bullshit.

If you are attracted to females 11 and over (most likely 11-14), you are not a pedophile. That makes you a hebephile. Although most men are preferential teleiophiles (17ish+), it is normal and widespread for men to find females in this age range sexually attractive as well, although good luck getting anyone to admit that they think middle schoolers are kind of hot in today's world. Some studies show that possibly up to 20% of men have a hebephilic preference. Our species was selected to evolve in this way, which explains why this relationship dynamic has never been considered an issue anywhere in the world for all of human history until like the end of the 1800's when the AoC was raised to an unnaturally high age amidst a panic-ridden populace in the throes of mass hysteria over a largely fictitious work of yellow journalism by W. T. Stead "exposing" an underground child prostitution ring right under everyone's noses in Victorian England. At least we have the consolation prize of knowing the guy who wrote that garbage went down with the Titanic. America suffered a similar panic over prostitution, but the raising of the AoC here was to prevent newly-freed black men from having sex with white chicks and tainting the purity of the white race. It was never raised because people saw hebephilic relationships immoral or "predatory" (it was actually the norm at the time). The age of consent had always either been 12 or lower (it was 10 at the time, actually) in every society through all time. Under any other circumstance, no one in their right mind would have ever agreed to this blatant violation of personal freedom.

Being raped as a child has nothing to do with pedophilia, and most rapes are not even committed by pedophiles.

Up until the late 70's, therapists recommended CP as an effective outlet, although it wouldn't matter very long because the sexual liberation movement was full steam ahead. All the research was showing kids were sexual beings and willing relationships were perfectly harmless. There were many outspoken activists and large activist organizations pushing for abolition of the AoC. The prevailing attitude of the day was that sex is a healthy and necessary part of growing up and everyone has the human right to erotic pleasure -- sex-positivity. They very nearly succeeded until a fringe group of radical sex-negative feminists started spewing out a whole bunch of baseless, unempirical, and unsupported nonsense about power dynamics and tried to co-opt the concept of informed consent, a medical term, bastardized it, and tried to apply it to sexual consent; as if having an orgasm is such an extreme life-risking endeavor akin to triple-bypass heart surgery. They also co-opted feminist rape rhetoric and applied the same terminology to willing intergenerational relationships, calling them invariably abusive, manipulative, and harmful without justification. No one paid any attention to those prudish sex-hating lunatics until very wealthy and influential far-right religious "my child is my property" conservatives realized that they had a common interest. All the sudden these feminists with their not only wacky, but harmful beliefs were given a platform, dissenting opinions were suppressed, and heaps of funding magically became available for anyone willing to produce "research" that contradicted all past research and supported this new abuse/victim narrative. Little did they know they struck a gold mine, and once the reformists caught wind of how much money there was to be made by switching sides, many of them jumped ship to follow the money. What can I say? We ARE Americans, after all.

I gotta say, although this has led to countless lives being needlessly destroyed, it was a brilliant strategic move that caught everybody off-guard. The seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of sexual freedom was stopped dead in its tracks basically overnight. The actual reason why everyone hates "pedophiles" and that kids are harmed by such relationships today has nothing to do with the innate rightness or wrongness of it. The sad truth is that the CSA victim industry is extremely profitable and has now become institutionalized; it's essentially a religion these days. Many people's careers now revolve around this narrative and have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. They've even started pushing for the censorship of people who are catching on and speaking out against this toxic ideology. That is definitely not a tactic a true believer would ever feel the need to employ. But, it is also a sign that they feel threatened and fear losing their grip on power.

Also, people often assert vulnerability and innocence. But being preferentially attracted to females at peak reproductive value (11-14) is not a disorder and implies none of those things any more than being preferentially attracted to ones at peak fertility (late teens/early 20's) does.

Innocence, vulnerability, and power gaps are modern concepts not intrinsic to humans that have been imposed on people since Victorian times. Before then, there was no concept of a "childhood" extending past like 7 or 8. People were just people. Now there's an artificial divide between people under 18 and over 18. This appears to work out okay for most people, but actually makes life hell for others for no good reason.

There is this modern invention of people thinking you're up to no good unless you're with someone your own age. This doesn't just apply to teen/adult relationships. People are giving Leonardo DiCaprio shit for dating 20 year olds.

The "having to be with someone your own age" nonsense is VERY new in human history and is only seriously predominant in America, the country with the most deviant sexual norms in human history. Also the country with the 2nd (only to Ukraine, who's being invaded by Russia ATM) highest rate of depression in the world and the highest rates of STDs and unwanted pregnancy in the Western world.

By contrast, Mexico has an AoC of 12 and most of Europe's is 14 without causing serious social problems. How do we account for that, and why are they more free than the citizens of the country that calls itself “the land of the free?”

No one can help who they feel attracted to; that spark, that butterflies-in-your-tummy feeling, who they feel happiest around.

I'm not a fan of demonizing people because of arbitrary social norms. Like I said, the AoC in Mexico is 12, but since they're younger and have less experience, if they want to be with someone 18+, they can bring charges on the older party if they feel used/taken advantage of. They understand that willing relationships aren't harmful and people deserve freedom in their personal lives.
Post Reply